Em todo o caso, mesmo que o fim das identidades culturais nacionais seja uma fatalidade produzida pela mundialização capitalista, pela lei do crescimento desigual neste sistema mundial e pelas guerras que ele desencadeia, forçando ambas a migração para os países mais desenvolvidos, que também fazem baixar com isso o “custo do trabalho” local, não posso deixar escapar o sentimento de uma amarga nostalgia antecipada por uma cultura que, de algum modo paradoxal e complexo, muito amo e da qual me verei desenraizado em breve. É neste espírito, segundo o qual nem só de pão vive o homem, mas também da paisagem trabalhada distintamente por este povo, com resultados específicos, mas também da sua arquitectura, embora influenciada por estilos exógenos, mas também dos costumes e práticas artesanais, mas também da sua língua, mas também dos seus pintores, músicos e escritores, consciente todavia de que tudo muda sob a ponte, que tudo o que vive vai morrer, certo que, por exemplo, o meu Eça da Cidade e as Serras, um pouco vivo ainda em certos locais do Douro, no espírito e na paisagem, já não voltará, que cito para reflexão os três artigos abaixo, com muitas discordâncias de perspectiva, volto a dizer, porque não denunciam as verdadeiras causas da imigração (sobretudo a lei do desenvolvimento desigual das nações sob o domínio mundial do capitalismo) e porque manifestam tendências irracionais contraditórias, proteccionistas e corporativistas capitalistas, portanto fascizantes, sem solução, que não seja para pior, do problema.
O que está em jogo é, em suma, a combinação do complexo militar-industrial estado-unidense, da táctica israelita de arregimentar os sunitas contra os xiitas (Irão e com influência na Síria aliada), do esforço para tentar manter o dólar como moeda de troca e fiduciária internacional, o problema do desenvolvimento desigual no sistema capitalista mundial, que conduz às migrações, assim como o cosmopolitismo liberal e capitalista, que se está nas tintas para os povos e que vê nas fronteiras e nas diferenças culturais e jurídicas nacionais um obstáculo aos negócios das multinacionais.
Mas há uma pergunta que fica: será que os EUA (USA) querem islamizar a Europa, com a anuência dos seus capachos Reino Unido , Alemanha, França e Itália, como estratégia para cercar a Rússia de inimigos muçulmanos e melhor preparar no futuro uma guerra contra esse grande país, ou, pelo menos, imergi-lo em potenciais conflitos étnicos que levem à sua fragmentação? Alucinação? Verdade? Quem sabe?
Abstract: Thanks to the dictatorial Euro-Mediterranean Process/the Union for the Mediterranean, Europe now suffers from a disease much more deadly to the white race and their culture than Ebola: Muslim mass immigration, which in this century will make Europe look demographically and probably culturally as well like North Africa today. The financial costs are enormous. One of the EU-fathers, Rothschild-paid Coudenhove Khalergi, expressed the purpose clearly: Ethnic cleansing of Whites in Europe in favor of a mongrel breed, similar to the ancient Egyptians, and the Jewish master race elite as the rulers of this new world order.
Bilderberger, Trilateral Commissionist, former EU Commissioner, Goldman Sachs Board Director and UN consultant, Peter Sutherland, demanded the EU to do everything possible to undermine the ethnic homogeneity of the member countries.
British Tony Blair said he would destroy the existing social order by Muslim mass immigration – and in 2008 his successor, Gordon Brown, boasted to have been the midwife of this NWO.
French President Sarkozy wanted to possibly enforce this racial and cultural crossbreeding violently, if necessary.
So far, the media, politicians and opinion makers have simply ignored the scope of the immigration problem and protests with primitive phrases like “racism”- or censored them away. However, now they recognize the growing anger in their populations, who are conscious of the immense costs and the crime wave of immigration in an era where the welfare state is being economized away.
Some elitists now try to play down the problem by manipulating numbers – while others are more realistic. For instance, the EU makes as if it clamps down on illegal (now acc. to EU Commissioner Malmström a taboo word) refugees. The EU contributes itself to their numbers by approving of senseless wars of its member states against alleged “enemies” such as IS(IS) and Al-Qaeda, drivin Muslims out of their countries. NATO and the CIA has established, trained and equipped them with EU-approval, let alone the US / George Soros-Rothschild-launched Arab Spring.
The refugees are embraced by e.g. the Government Ltd. – and no government protests against them – except the British one, but it does nothing about it.
The EU acts as if it wanted to halt the flow of refugees across the Mediterranean with a symbolic Frontex to stop, save and return the illegals, which it cannot, however, because the Euromediterranean “partners” do not respect the EU’s human rights. In 2004, thus, 650,000 asylum claims were rejected, but only 164,000 persons were returned – with a fat check! The illegals have an easy play: Spain simply legalized 800.000 of them some years ago. Otherwise, they only need to beget one child in the EU. The child will automatically be an EU citizen with the right to family reunification with its parents etc..
When a refugee arrives in Italy or Greece and prefers to go where benefits are best, that country is often unable to return such a social tourists to the EU country of arrival, because conditions there do not meet luxury requirements (Verdict of the ECtHR Nov. 2014).
In order to facilitate the refugees on the whole, voices in the EU are becoming loud that the EU should build offices in North Africa and the Middle East, where emigration-willing can apply for asylum and travel into the EU at our expense rather than drowning in the Mediterranean.
Under his Luciferian coat of arms and with the Masonic sign of the claws of the devil, the Pope wholeheartedly supports this European suicide and pays homage to the immigration of Muslims, while they persecute and kill the Christians in their countries.
A disease much more deadly than Ebola has befallen Europe and the world. An engineered demographic process of destruction of the white race and culture is on-going – even on first class for Muslim immigrants. See this horrendous ECHR-verdict:
The European Court of Human Rights has just decided Switzerland transgressed ECHR´s article 3. Switzerland had declined to treat an asylum application from an Afghan family with 6 children and sent them back to Italy, where this family first arrived in Europe. Austria had declined to give asylum. The ECHR found that conditions in Italy were too poor to accomodate the family appropriately! Previously, the ECHR has deemed returns to Greece inappropriate. The refugees are entitled to a certain degree of luxury at our cost – which will attract many more poor Muslims!
One argument for the mass immigration is lack of labour – although non-EU immigrants are generally unskilled and without European working morals. Time and again, politicians and media maintain, “Immigrants” are a fiscal gain – without differentiating. A study published in The Daily Mail 5 Nov. 2014 tells a different story: Non-European migrants living in Britain have cost the public finances almost £120billion since 1995, according to a study by the University College London. Such large sums are a well-known fact from other studies.
It was Louis Rothschild/Max Warburg funded Count Richard Coudenhove Khalergi, the founder of the Paneuropean Union and one of the EU pioneers, who said: “The man of the future will be a mongrel. Today’s races and classes will disappear owing to the disappearing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its outward appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals […] Instead of destroying Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process. The superiority of their spirit predestines them to become a main factor of the future nobility”.
Tony Blair and the Labour Party declared war on their own people, and there is (as yet) no substantive reason to believe we can survive this century, let alone the long term.
Gallia Watch 20 Dec. 2008 : (Pres.) Sarkozy: “(…) the objective is to meet the challenge of “métissage”/crossbreeding – the challenge of “métissage”/crossbreeding that the 21st century is confronting us with. .. it is consanguinity that has always provoked the end of civilizations and societies.”
If republican will power does not function, it will be necessary for the Republic to resort to even more forcible methods”.
While immigrants and refugees are flowing into Europe in so large quantities as have not been seen for many years the corporate media/government reactions are varying. Some try desperately to defusethe serious situation – while others, including the EU, try to make us believe, they are doing something serious to stem this tidal wave of immigrants, while doing nothing, in fact.
“It is not all that bad”
The Independent 29 Oct. 2014 British people think that there are twice as many immigrants in the country than is really the case – and four times as many Muslims, according to a new survey by Ipsos Mori.
Schweden, Frankreich und Italien.
Deutsche Wirtschaftsnachrichten 28 Oct. 2014: In Germany, there were 136,000 asylum applications until the end of September. In September over 19,000 asylum applications were filed, of which 23,600 initial claims were from Syrians – three times as many as in the same period last year. However, from all republics of former Yugoslavia together, there are almost as many asylum seekers as from Syria. 75,000 of the 239,000 new asylum seekers in the EU from January to June fell on Germany, which are 31%. This places Germany as No. 1 in the EU, ahead of Sweden, France and Italy.
The Asylum offices were unable to cope with the current rise in the numbers of asylum seekerss. So far this year, they have only made around 87,000 asylum decisions.
Very few asylum seekers are recognized as political refugees. This year there were only about 1,500 so far, which corresponds to a rate of 1.7%. A further 24,000 were given the status as refugees or as in need of protection for any other reason and may thus also officially remain in Germany. The “total protection rate” is 29.5% accordingly.
Right: Migrationbackground in Germany 2012 – Wikipedia.The European immigration group contains Muslims from the Balkans.
The German government embraces the “refugees”Deutsche Welle 29. Oct. 2014: The German Cabinet has just drafted a bill that would eliminate some of the restrictions for asylum seekers. The law seeks to ease residency and employment requirements. It targets employment restrictions which currently prioritize German and EU citizens. The cabinet proposed on Wednesday that asylum seekers be allowed to compete equally in the job market after a 15-month stay in Germany. Meanwhile, job seekers with expertise in short-staffed fields would not be subjected to any employment restrictions.
After three months of living in Germany, they would be allowed to move more freely across state lines, for example to visit friends or relatives.
“This is bad”
Communities find it increasingly difficult to cope as they run into problems providing adequate housing. German lawmaker Martin Patzelt suggests citizens who wish to do so should be allowed to take refugees into their homes.
Martin Patzelt: This would signal solidarity. In Berlin and Schleswig Holstein, refugees can be housed privately – but the taxpayer foots the bill for rent. About 100 people have come forward nationwide, saying they would offer accommodation along those lines
The Daily Mail 29 Oct. 2014: 50,000 Illegal immigrants in Britain are missing.Another 175,000 illegal immigrants are yet to be deported.
29,000 applications dating back seven years are yet to be resolved.
Mayor of Calais says British handouts make it an ‘El Dorado’ for migrants.
Minister Nick Boles admits UK will never control its borders in the EU.
ANSAMED.27 Oct. 2014: Europe has asked Spain to boost border checks in Ceuta and Melilla to prevent jihadists from entering the country. Interior ministry sources said Monday that the request was issued by Brussels on October 9 during the last EU Council of Justice and Home Affairs.
Below: Immigrants crawling over fence to Spanish enclave in North Africa
Madrid last summer sent 200 Guardia civil agents to prevent immigrants from illegally entering and does not reportedly mean to further boost border surveillance. However, it will train agents so they can ”identify terror elements”, the sources said.Over the past few months, at least four suspected Islamist extremistswere able to cross the borders of the two Spanish enclaves in Morocco.
33,913 illegal immigrants entered Spain in 2013.
The Telegraph 23 Oct. 2014: In 2013, more than 75,000 allegations (of illegal immigrants) were received, which by the end of February 2014 had resulted in over 4,000 arrests and almost 1,000 removals. Four out of 10 allegations about suspected immigration offenders are not acted on by the Home Office within a two-day official timescale
ANSAmed 17 Oct. 2014: The most obvious sign of Europe cracking down on immigration this fall is European operation Mos MaiorumThe two-week-long sweeping police operation across Europe deploys 18,000 security officers to identify and control illegal immigrants and asylum seekers. Also see EU-Observer 14 Oct. 2014 – which furthermore states: Frontex has nothing to do with the Mos Majorum. It only provides the Italians with statistics and data analysis of migratory flows. Estimates suggest there is anywhere from 150,000 to 450,000 people without proper documents are in the EU.
Immigrants are being sent back to Italy – France reportedly sent 3,000 back to the country over the past few months, along with Switzerland and Austria, among others.
Yet as European Union countries are closing their borders and repatriating immigrants, governments are ”outsourcing” surveillance operations against illegal migrants, the agency said. It cited as an example Italy’s donation to Tunisia of two new offshore patrol vessels to check on its coasts – like Libya as ”policeman of the Mediterranean” under a migration agreement signed in 2011.
In Libya refugees are kept in miserable camps, tortures and forced into the al Qaeda militia. ”We are facing an unprecedented humanitarian catastrophe”, said Zerai, calling on Europe to spend on development policy in countries of emigration rather than to crack down on immigration.
ANSAmed 30 Oct. 2014: The European Union’s maritime patrol operation Triton operated by the EU border agency Frontex, will use six ships, two airplanes, and one helicopter to patrol for illegal migrants fleeing from North Africa and the Middle East to Europe.
But with only one-third of the budget of Mare Nostrum, officials have said Triton will emphasize border control more than rescue. The patrol boats will remain within about 30 miles of Italian land.
However, rescue operations can exceed that limit if needed. About150,000 migrants – mostly from northern Africa and the Middle East – have been rescued by Italian ships in the 12 months since Mare Nostrum began.
BUT: ANSAmed 31 Oct. 2014: Italian home minister Angelino Alfano said the Frontex operation “could never strip a country of its responsibilities to meet laws” including migrant rescue. But Europe should set up “welcome zones” for warzone refugees in Africa and try to process asylum requests there before waiting for boat people to cross the Mediterranean. He is echoed by the new EU Commissioner for immigration, Dimitris Avramopoul
Irresponsible and unwise EU is now begetting dangerous counter pressure.
School for Nazis: Parents’ horror as children in German school begin greeting one another with ‘Heil Hitler’ and using Nazi slogans
Entire year 9 class thought to have been communicating in ‘Nazi slogans’.
German authorities investigating 29 teenagers on WhatsApp conversations
Teens ‘swapped Nazi sayings and slogans throughout the school day
Pictures show teens doing Heil Hitler salutes and wearing Hitler moustaches.
So where does this leave us Europeans looking out for a strong limitation of the endless invasion of Europe by Muslims heeding the call of the Koran to emigrate and conquer the World for Allah (Sure 2:218, 3:195, 4:110, 33:27) – massively supported by EU and national politicians in the name of the NWO?
If the number of 239,000 asylum seekers in the first three quarters of 2014 is correct, we will have 300,000 applicants at the end of the year. The rejected asylum seekers probably only exceptionally leave the EU because the EU fundamental rights are not respected in Muslim countries and the West are taking care of perpetual war in their countries of origin.
Thus, according to the EESC, “650.000 asylum rejections were made in 2004, but only 164. 000 were returned to their home countries, while 500,000 non-citizens were left in a de facto illegal situation. The EU wants them to settle in the EU “. Family reunification (probably at least 2 children + 1 spouse + 2 grandparents + more children coming) then this adds to their number up to perhaps 1.8 million per year. At the end of the century we will thus have had through 86 years up to 154.8 million migrants, mainly Muslims, in this way, plus all the Muslims who are already staying here plus the illegals. This latter group probably makes an even greater number than the asylum seekers.
The illegals need merely produce a child in the EU, which is then automatically an EU citizen – with the right to stay and remain reunified with its illegal parents (the Zambrano-verdict). Because European women have fewer children than Muslim ones – in 2012, EU-28’s birthrate was 1.5 per woman, while Muslim women had 2.2 children.
The Masonic and corrupt EU NWOsystem has felt the increasing anger of their populations and try to calm them by lies and half truths.
The truth is that this is pure nonsense: They mention Libya´s policing as an example!! This “policeman” let 150.000 migrants reach Italy from Libya within 1 year.
Now take the EU´s Triton Project which started on 1 Nov. 2014. It is an additional effort to save refugees and make their voyage safer: EU Press Release 7 Oct. 2014: “It implies that Italy will have to continue making continued substantial efforts using national means, fully coordinated with the Frontex operation, to manage the situation.”
EU Press Release 7 Oct. 2014 – insatiable EU Commissioner Cecilia Malmström (right): “It is vital that EU states now fully implement the Common European Asylum System, and that a serious effort will be made to establish a truly European program for the resettlement of refugees. The challenges that the EU is facing requires all Member States to take responsibility, and offer protection to those in need.” Ms. Malmström does not care about the 300 Swedish children and 700 women being rape by Muslim immgrants during the first 7 months of 2013 – as though her fellow country women were not in increasing need due to her irresponsibility
Germany is leading the way in attempting to flood the EU with poverty stricken immigrants to compensate for economic failure. Don’t blame those immigrants, but do blame the blinkered, politically correct politicians destroying Europe
Germany’s Finance Minister, Wolfgang Schaeuble (Germany’s answer to Ken Clarke?) claims Germany — and by implication the rest of Europe, including Britain — needs more immigrants.
It’s hard to believe that apparently intelligent politicians continue to try and make an economic case for immigration when all the evidence is strongly against it.
It’s hard to believe, but let’s have a look at what that evidence is and just what exactly are Herr Schaeuble’s arguments for more immigration to Germany and the rest of the EU.
Herr Schaeuble says: “Just as we used millions of refugees and expellees after World War Two to rebuild, so we need immigration today.”
Got that? Post-war, starving Germany, with virtually no mechanical power and dependent on human labour, used starving refugees and its own Trummerfrauen — destitute female hod carriers — to build the German economy.
And that’s why today, after over sixty years of affluence and being one of the most technically advanced countries on the planet, Germany, according to Herr Schaeuble, still needs more starving refugee immigrants.
I suppose it’s to be applauded when a politician speaks the blunt truth. At least Herr Schaeuble’s call to base the German and EU economies on cheap refugee labour is entirely up front and honest.
But is Herr Schaeuble honest enough to admit that competition with refugees will reduce the German and EU workers’ wages to refugee levels, perhaps even to the level of female Third World hod carriers?
Is Herr Schaeuble honest enough to admit that Third World immigrants and Third World wages mean a Third World culture, already to be seen in areas of west London with thousands of immigrants living in illegally converted garages, making Southall look like shanty town Bombay in the film Slumdog Millionaire?
Uncontrolled, unskilled Third World immigration is the economics of the madhouse, yet respectable politicians like Herr Schaeuble in Germany support it and, until recently, virtually the whole British political establishment were gung-ho for it, and still would be were it not for Nigel Farage.
Marx, who was wrong on most things, understood more than most the anarchic, socially destructive effects of money-grubbing unrestricted labour and capital markets that have no respect for national values and tradition. With unrestricted immigration in particular, cohesive social communities, both middle class and working class, lose their social capital and are eventually fragmented and destroyed.
It is precisely the damage done to living standards and to community life by years of unrestricted immigration that has prompted the recent anti-immigrant demonstrations in Germany.
Ordinary people know and understand something that pro-immigration economists and politicians are ignorant of or simply ignore: uncontrolled immigration does not improve per capita income, or in plain man’s language, immigration does not make ordinary people financially or culturally better off.
In fact it makes them worse off. With cheap immigrant labour, profits are privatised while costs are socialised. Cheap immigrant labour might boost the profits of low wage employers, but in a welfare state the tax payer foots the immigrant bill while watching his local community become a foreign country.
The truth is that, in the modern world, an immigrant economy is an economy that has failed to invest in its own people. Instead of investment in skills and long-term real-economy jobs, a policy of cheap immigrant labour is pursued while large sections of the native workforce are fobbed-off with welfarism and deferred-adulthood “educational” courses that do nothing educational, but make politicians look good by keeping “students” off the unemployment register.
Ordinary people, whether in Britain, France or Germany, can see the problems every day of their lives because they have to live with the consequences of uncontrolled immigration. They understand that immigration as a solution to economic problems is a socially destructive and impoverishing business model.
For example, the German magazine Spiegel On Line reported a study of Germany’s main non-European immigrant group, the Turks. The study found they were very badly integrated into German society (no surprise there) and estimated that failed immigration costs the German tax payer $20 billion per year.
Even in Canada, a country that for decades has practised a highly selective immigration policy, a University of Montreal 2002 study of several economies found that immigration had no statistically significant impact on per capita income. Yet this failed, unrestricted immigrant business model is what the German Finance Minister Herr Schaeuble is pushing on Europe.
Right-wing fast-buck free marketeers and virtually the whole of the political Left agree on one thing: endless, uncontrolled immigration. Both are wrong.
The Left have always supported any policy that damaged Western culture and institutions because, as Orwell put it, they are a “deracinated” lot. But now the Left have joined the fast-buck Right by claiming an economic justification for uncontrolled immigration.
For the Left, Europe needs unlimited immigration to support a non-replacement birth rate and a greying western population. Again, it’s a business model just as insane as the fast-buck free market model. And it’s insane for two reasons.
First, a study by Gerhard Heilig, former Chief of the Population Estimates and Projections Section at the UN, has dismissed as mind-boggling and absurd the notion that immigration could solve Europe’s demographic problems.
Germany, for example, over the next 90 years would need to increase its current population from 82 million to 490 million by bringing in 261 million immigrants, simply to maintain the current old-age dependency ratio.
It’s obvious to any sane person that such a policy would be economically catastrophic and self defeating because immigrants, amazingly, also grow old and become dependent on the state. What then, import another 261 million?
It would also, of course, be cultural suicide, as most of the immigrants would have to be non-Europeans. Is that what the Herr Schaeubles and Ken Clarkes of this world want?
But the second reason immigration as an economic solution does not work is that many immigrants, as the study of Turks in Germany shows, can be a major burden on the welfare state, not a support to it. Turkish immigrants in Germany, for example, have three times the rate of welfare dependency as ethnic Germans.
To say that is not to blame the immigrants. They come to Europe not to help Europeans, but to help themselves. They are rational people, and just like Europeans, they (particularly the unskilled) quickly figure out the welfare survival map. And who can blame them?
The anti-immigration demonstrations in Germany by Pegida (Patriotic Europeans against the Islamisation of the West) are attracting large numbers and seem set to grow, regardless of what you may think of them. They are unlikely to be convinced by Herr Schaeuble’s insane economic policies.
Shock therapy: Notes on the humanitarian invasion of Europe